Pitts: Do presidential elections affect
state races?
by William O. Pitts
September 15, 2008
If a recent poll commissioned by Oklahoma City television
station KWTV is even reasonably accurate, the race for Oklahoma’s seven
presidential electors is over with a big victory for Republicans.
Latest Opinion
News
According to the poll of 1,100 voters, the
Republican presidential ticket of John McCain and Sarah Palin has 65.9 percent
of the vote to the Democrat ticket of Barack Obama and Joe Biden of 27.9 percent,
with only 6.2 percent of the voters undecided.
Similarly in the U. S. Senate Race incumbent
Republican James Inhofe has a lead of 28 percentage points over Democrat Andrew
Rice, with only 10 percent undecided. In both instances the small percentage of
undecided voters is a problem for Democrats
Assuming Obama/Biden and Rice got all of
those votes it would not change the outcome of either election. That leaves a
lot of voters actually to be switched in a seven-week period. It could change
some but it is unlikely to alter the eventual outcome.
Since 1950, Oklahomans’ yen for Republican
presidential nominees has occurred every four years except in 1964 when Lyndon
B. Johnson carried the state over Republican Barry Goldwater.
Gubernatorial races are not affected because they
occur in alternate four-year cycles, but how much affect have presidential
elections had on legislative races since then? In 2000, President George W.
Bush carried Oklahoma with 60 percent
of the vote and Republicans made gains in the legislature. In 2004 Bush again
won Oklahoma by a 65 to 35
percent margin over Democrat John Kerry. That was the first time in 80 years
the state House of Representatives has been controlled by Republicans, and in
the State Senate they made strides toward gaining control of that body.
That Bush’s margin of victory contributed to those
gains seems obvious, but legislative term limits that came into effect that
year also was a major factor and until recently Oklahoma voters’ preference for
Republican presidential candidates did not translate into votes for legislative
candidates.
At the 1996 presidential election Republican Bob
Dole defeated Democrat Bill Clinton in Oklahoma by nearly
100,000 votes, and Oklahoma’s entire
Congressional delegation (two U.S. senators and
six congressmen) was Republican. The state had a governor, lieutenant governor,
state labor commissioner, insurance commissioner and three corporation
commissioners all of whom were Republicans.
That is quite impressive, but at the same time in
the Oklahoma House of Representatives and State Senate Democrats had a
two-to-one majority. A political anomaly, it continued through the 1998
election.
Today, Republicans hold two of the three
corporation commission posts and apparently the Republican nominee is leading
substantially over the incumbent Democrat appointee to the third, but no other
statewide elected posts. Democrats have all of the statewide elected executive
branch offices from governor to state superintendent of public schools. Republicans
control the House and split control of the evenly divided Senate.
Their congressional numbers include four of the
state’s five members of the U. S. House of Representatives, all of whom are
likely to be reelected, and two U.S. senators, one
of whom is leading substantially in the KWTV poll.
With the presidential margin so great, the
possibility of substantial Republican gains in the legislature would seem to
exist but there are reasons why it may not. There are far fewer House seats
open this year than there were in 2004.
Redistricting in this decade more clearly
delineated areas of Republican and Democrat strength, meaning fewer chances for
Republican gains than in the past. In 2006 Republicans held onto their House
margin of 57 to 44. Little change is expected this year.
The state Senate is a different story. Democrats
lost sole control of that body in 2006 for the first time when it was split
evenly 24 to 24. There are indications Republicans can gain the majority this
year.
The McCain-Palin coattails/skirt may not materially
affect the legislative races, but they certainly will not hurt.
William O. Pitts may be reached by phone at
405-278-2880 or by e-mailing bill.pitts@journalrecord.com.
Posted on
Monday, September 15, 2008
by William Pitts